Re: [PATCH] Staging: winbond: wbusb: Fixed coding style issue

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:22:18AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 21:40 +0530, Adil Mujeeb wrote:
> > Repalces printk's with pr_debug
> []
> > diff --git a/linux-3.6-rc7/drivers/staging/winbond/wbusb.c b/linux-3.6-rc7/drivers/staging/winbond/wbusb.c
> > index 0ca857a..48fe622 100644
> > --- a/linux-3.6-rc7/drivers/staging/winbond/wbusb.c
> > +++ b/linux-3.6-rc7/drivers/staging/winbond/wbusb.c
> > @@ -79,18 +79,18 @@ static int wbsoft_add_interface(struct ieee80211_hw *dev,
> >  static void wbsoft_remove_interface(struct ieee80211_hw *dev,
> >  				    struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
> >  {
> > -	printk("wbsoft_remove interface called\n");
> > +	pr_debug("wbsoft_remove interface called\n");
> 
> It'd be more consistent to use
> 	pr_debug("%s called\n", __func__);
> everywhere.
> 
> It might be even nicer to remove almost all of these.
> 

Yes, "tracing" type debug calls like this should all be removed, now
that we have built-in function call tracing in the core kernel itself.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/