Re: [PATCH] printk: drop ambiguous LOG_CONT flag

[Kay Sievers]

On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:54 PM, "Jan H. SchÃnherr"
<schnhrr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am 08.10.2012 21:24, schrieb Kay Sievers:
>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Kay Sievers <kay@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:49 PM, "Jan H. SchÃnherr"
>>
>>>> Given that I'm able to fix the racing case, would you be in favor of
>>>> this approach, or should we stick to the earlier version?
>>>
>>> I'm open to everything that makes sense. Let's see how it looks and we
>>> can decide when we have something that passes the tests.
>>
>> Jan,
>> any updates, did you try something else?
>> Or should we merge the first version for now?
>
> I'm working on it, though I cannot spend as much time as I want. :)
>
> My current version does mostly well for race-printk()s, now. But
> there's still one issue to resolve and some polishing to do.
>
> If we can afford to wait a little longer, we might get a nicer
> solution (and avoid a possible mostly-revert later).

Sure, no hurry, I was just going through my TODO emails. :)

Thanks,
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/