[PATCH] Fix endless looping between cascade() andinternal_add_timer()

From: Hildner, Christian
Date: Mon Oct 08 2012 - 10:00:04 EST


From: Christian Hildner <christian.hildner@xxxxxxxxxxx>

This patch ensures that when cascade() is called timers within tv5 are not added endlessly to their own list again, instead they are added to the next lower tv level tv4 (as expected).

Signed-off-by: Christian Hildner <christian.hildner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Adding two (or more) timers with large values for "expires" (they have to reside within tv5 in the same list) leads to endless looping between cascade() and internal_add_timer() in case CONFIG_BASE_SMALL is one and jiffies are crossing the value 1 << 18. The bug was introduced between 2.6.11 and 2.6.12 (and survived for quite some time).

Tested with 2.6.14, patch is for 3.6.1 - see below.


diff -urN linux-3.6.1_orig/kernel/timer.c linux-3.6.1/kernel/timer.c
--- linux-3.6.1_orig/kernel/timer.c 2012-10-07 17:41:28.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-3.6.1/kernel/timer.c 2012-10-08 09:34:40.000000000 +0200
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@
#define TVR_SIZE (1 << TVR_BITS)
#define TVN_MASK (TVN_SIZE - 1)
#define TVR_MASK (TVR_SIZE - 1)
+#define MAX_TVAL ((unsigned long)((1ULL << (TVR_BITS + 4*TVN_BITS)) - 1))

struct tvec {
struct list_head vec[TVN_SIZE];
@@ -358,11 +359,12 @@
vec = base->tv1.vec + (base->timer_jiffies & TVR_MASK);
} else {
int i;
- /* If the timeout is larger than 0xffffffff on 64-bit
- * architectures then we use the maximum timeout:
+ /* If the timeout is larger than MAX_TVAL (on 64-bit
+ * architectures or with CONFIG_BASE_SMALL=1) then we
+ * use the maximum timeout.
*/
- if (idx > 0xffffffffUL) {
- idx = 0xffffffffUL;
+ if (idx > MAX_TVAL) {
+ idx = MAX_TVAL;
expires = idx + base->timer_jiffies;
}
i = (expires >> (TVR_BITS + 3 * TVN_BITS)) & TVN_MASK;--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/