Re: [PATCH 20/40] autonuma: alloc/free/init mm_autonuma

From: Andrea Arcangeli
Date: Sat Jul 14 2012 - 13:04:03 EST


On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 09:19:06AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 08:08:28PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 01:12:18AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 02:56:00PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > > > > This is where the mm_autonuma structure is being handled. Just like
> > > > > sched_autonuma, this is only allocated at runtime if the hardware the
> > > > > kernel is running on has been detected as NUMA. On not NUMA hardware
> > > >
> > > > I think the correct wording is "non-NUMA", not "not NUMA".
> > >
> > > That sounds far too easy to me, but I've no idea what's the right is here.
> >
> > UMA?
> >
> > Single-node hardware?
>
> Lets be simple and stay with non-NUMA.

Ok, I already corrected all occurrences.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/