Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] bluetooth: /proc/net/ entries for bluetoothprotocols

From: Masatake YAMATO
Date: Wed Jul 11 2012 - 08:19:04 EST


Hi,

> Hi Masatake,
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 01:58:31PM +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
>> (The patch sets are rebased to bluetooth-next. Unnecessary white
>> spaces are trimmed.)
>>
>> lsof command can tell the type of socket processes are using.
>> Internal lsof uses inode numbers on socket fs to resolve the type of
>> sockets. Files under /proc/net/, such as tcp, udp, unix, etc provides
>> such inode information.
>>
>> Unfortunately bluetooth related protocols don't provide such inode
>> information. This patch series introduces /proc/net files for the protocols.
>>
>> This patch against af_bluetooth.c provides facility to the implementation
>> of protocols. This patch extends bt_sock_list and introduces two exported
>> function bt_procfs_init, bt_procfs_cleanup.
>>
>> The type bt_sock_list is already used in some of implementation of
>> protocols. bt_procfs_init prepare seq_operations which converts
>> protocol own bt_sock_list data to protocol own proc entry when the
>> entry is accessed.
>>
>> What I, lsof user, need is just inode number of bluetooth
>> socket. However, people may want more information. The bt_procfs_init
>> takes a function pointer for customizing the show handler of
>> seq_operations.
>
> I've tested the patch and it creates entries in /proc/net

Thanks.

> BTW: Shall lsof be able to identify l2cap protocol?
>
> for l2test it prints: "can't identify protocol"

No. I'll work on lsof side after the kernel side
patches are merged to the main line.


Masatake YAMATO

> Best regards
> Andrei Emeltchenko
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/