Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: Defer failed gpio requests by default

[Linus Walleij]

On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Mark Brown
<broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Since users must be explicitly provided with a GPIO number in order to
> request one the overwhelmingly common case for failing to request will
> be that the required GPIO driver has not yet registered and we should
> therefore defer until it has registered.
>
> In order to avoid having to code this logic in individual drivers have
> gpio_request() return -EPROBE_DEFER when failing to look up the GPIO.
> Drivers which don't want this behaviour can override it if they desire.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

While this makes perfect sense to me I would *really* like to
wait for Grants opinion on this one patch, him having devised
the deferral and being GPIO maintainer.

Is any deferral of this deferral mechanism causing you to
defer important work right now?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/