Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Implement devm_gpio_request_one()
From: Linus Walleij
Date: Sat May 12 2012 - 19:19:59 EST
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Mark Brown
<broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Allow drivers to use the modern request and configure idiom together
> with devres.
>
> As with plain gpio_request() and gpio_request_one() we can't implement
> the old school version in terms of _one() as this would force the
> explicit selection of a direction in gpio_request() which could break
> systems if we pick the wrong one. Implementing devm_gpio_request_one()
> in terms of devm_gpio_request() would needlessly complicate things or
> lead to duplication from the unmanaged version depending on how it's
> done.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/