Re: [PATCH v3.4-rc3] MTD: NAND: ams-delta: Fixrequest_mem_region() failure

From: Tony Lindgren
Date: Fri May 04 2012 - 13:11:32 EST


Hi,

* Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [120430 11:15]:
> Dnia czwartek, 26 kwietnia 2012 08:20:59 Artem Bityutskiy pisze:
> > On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 19:01 +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > > Both drivers use separate subsets of registers that belong to the
> OMAP1
> > > MPU I/O device, but are used for controlling different sets of I/O
> pins.
> > > The NAND driver reads/writes the folowing registers:
> > > - OMAP_MPUIO_INPUT_LATCH,
> > > - OMAP_MPUIO_OUTPUT,
> > > - OMAP_MPUIO_IO_CNTL,
> > > while the keypad driver - the following:
> > > - OMAP_MPUIO_KBR_LATCH,
> > > - OMAP_MPUIO_KBC,
> > > - OMAP_MPUIO_KBD_MASKIT
> > > - OMAP_MPUIO_GPIO_DEBOUNCING.
> > > Both subsets are non-overlapping, and we rely on the drivers being
> free
> > > of bugs and doing their job correctly, not stepping on each others'
> > > feet, I guess.
> >
> > First of all, I think this information should be in the commit
> message.
> > Also, some sort of comment in the driver code would be nice.
> >
> > If locking the memory region is too coarse approach, the should have a
> > small separate omap-specific MPUIO subsystem which will be used by
> > drivers to access MPUIO?
> >
> > Another question - should request_mem_region() be also removed from
> the
> > omap-gpio driver then? I think it is more sensible to put a comment
> > there that it is sharing MPIO with other drivers, instead of having
> an
> > illusion of exclusive memory region ownership.
> >
> > But this is up to the OMAP community - I can take this patch to my
> > l2-mtd tree if you get an ack from Tony or other OMAP guys.
>
> Tony,
> Would I get your Ack for this fix if I extend the commit message as Artem
> suggested? If not, what do you think should be a correct way to fix the
> regression?

Well how about adding some exported functions to drivers/gpio/gpio_omap.c
like omap_mpuio_latch?

For the regression fix, if you guys want to do what Janusz is suggesting,
then assuming the patch description also contains some decent long term
plan to properly fix it:

Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/