Re: Inconsistent load average on tickless kernels

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 12:57 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> LesÅaw KopeÄ wrote:
> 
> > 2.6.32.55-hz-0f004f5a69			9.88
> > 2.6.32.55-no-hz-74f5187ac8		2.48
> > 2.6.32.55-no-hz-c308b56b53		2.22
> > 3.0.28-hz				10.66
> > 3.0.28-no-hz				0.60
> > 3.0.28-no-hz-c308b56b53			4.09
> > 3.0.28-no-hz-c308b56b53 nohz=off	6.78
> > 3.2.12-hz				10.16
> > 3.2.12-no-hz				0.66
> > 3.2.12-no-hz-c308b56b53			4.36
> >
> > What's worth noting is that I haven't seen any nasty side effects of the
> > latest patch on all kernel versions that I've tested. Hope that helps.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> Peter, do you think it would make sense to add c308b56b53987 to 3.0.y
> and newer stable kernels?

If anybody is still maintaining those and cares enough to do the work,
sure whatever.. ;)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/