[patch] slub: Revert "[PARISC] slub: fix panic with DISCONTIGMEM"

From: David Rientjes
Date: Tue May 10 2011 - 20:09:09 EST


On Mon, 9 May 2011, James Bottomley wrote:

> > Great, and if that works out successfully this time around I think we'll
> > either need to fix each individual arch Kconfig that we know doesn't work
> > well (at least parisc because of the scheduling issue) so that it at least
> > enables CONFIG_NUMA implicitly for discontigmem unless CONFIG_BROKEN is
> > set.
>
> OK, I confirm that the N_NORMAL_MEMORY patch on its own fixes slub for
> us. We can revert the mark slub BROKEN in DISCONTIGMEM && !NUMA patch.
>

Ok, so we need to revert 4a5fa3590f09 ([PARISC] slub: fix panic with
DISCONTIGMEM) that did not allow CONFIG_SLUB to be set for architectures
that use DISCONTIGMEM without NUMA support unless they have CONFIG_BROKEN
set from Linus' tree _and_ from the stable trees.



slub: Revert "[PARISC] slub: fix panic with DISCONTIGMEM"

4a5fa3590f09 ([PARISC] slub: fix panic with DISCONTIGMEM) did not allow
SLUB to be used on architectures that use DISCONTIGMEM without compiling
NUMA support without CONFIG_BROKEN also set.

The slub panic that it was intended to prevent is addressed by
d9b41e0b54fd ([PARISC] set memory ranges in N_NORMAL_MEMORY when onlined)
on parisc so there is no further slub issues with such a configuration.

This reverts the former commit so that SLUB may now be used on such
architectures since there haven't been any reports of additional errors.

Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
init/Kconfig | 1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -1226,7 +1226,6 @@ config SLAB
per cpu and per node queues.

config SLUB
- depends on BROKEN || NUMA || !DISCONTIGMEM
bool "SLUB (Unqueued Allocator)"
help
SLUB is a slab allocator that minimizes cache line usage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/