Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread

[david]

On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 04:19:20PM -0700, david@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > only consider the activity of a subset of processes when deciding if we
> > should suspend or not. If the decision is to suspend, freeze everything.
> >
> > you (and many other people) are confusing what I've proposed (use cgroups
> > to indicate what processes to care about and what ones to not care about
> > when deciding to suspend/go to idle) with the prior cgroup proposal (use
> > cgroups to freeze a subset of tasks while leaving others runnable)
>
> The decision on whether or not to go to sleep isn't the difficult bit of
> this problem space.

but isn't that all that wakelocks do? affect the decision on whether or 
not to go to sleep.

David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/