Re: [AppArmor #7 0/13] AppArmor security module

[James Morris]

On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Pavel Machek wrote:

> > Note that I added the patch below to update AA against the latest 
> > version of path_truncate:
> 
> Ok, so now we have two name-based "security" modules. Can we at least
> drop TOMOYO? That seems to have all apparmor disadvantages plus some
> more...

No.  The policy is that any security module which implements an access 
control scheme and meets a well-defined security goal, and passes 
technical review, may be merged.

aka, The Arjan Protocol:

http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Documenting_Security_Module_Intent


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/