Re: [AppArmor #7 0/13] AppArmor security module

[Pavel Machek]

On Fri 2010-07-30 09:05:23, James Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, John Johansen wrote:
> 
> > This is the seveth general posting of the newest version of the
> > AppArmor security module it has been rewritten to use the security_path
> > hooks instead of the previous vfs approach.  The current implementation
> > is aimed at being as semantically close to previous versions of AppArmor
> > as possible while using the existing LSM infrastructure.
> 
> Applied to
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6#next
> 
> Please carry out any further development against the above tree.
> 
> Note that I added the patch below to update AA against the latest 
> version of path_truncate:

Ok, so now we have two name-based "security" modules. Can we at least
drop TOMOYO? That seems to have all apparmor disadvantages plus some
more...

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/