linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree

From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Wed Aug 04 2010 - 00:25:45 EST


Hi Greg,

After merging the driver-core tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:

drivers/pci/pci-label.c:100: error: unknown field 'owner' specified in initializer
drivers/pci/pci-label.c:100: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
drivers/pci/pci-label.c:105: error: unknown field 'owner' specified in initializer
drivers/pci/pci-label.c:105: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type

Caused by commit 60cc62ad579afa0eb5bded82e08dd0617d461d52 ("sysfs: Remove
owner field from sysfs struct attribute") interacting with commit
911e1c9b05a8e3559a7aa89083930700a0b9e7ee ("PCI: export SMBIOS provided
firmware instance and label to sysfs") from the pci tree.

I applied the following merge fix patch (Jesse, this patch can already be
applied to the pci tree without problems):

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:21:42 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] pci: update for owner removal from struct device_attribute

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pci/pci-label.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-label.c b/drivers/pci/pci-label.c
index 111500e..90c0a72 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-label.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-label.c
@@ -97,12 +97,12 @@ smbiosinstance_show(struct device *dev,
}

static struct device_attribute smbios_attr_label = {
- .attr = {.name = "label", .mode = 0444, .owner = THIS_MODULE},
+ .attr = {.name = "label", .mode = 0444},
.show = smbioslabel_show,
};

static struct device_attribute smbios_attr_instance = {
- .attr = {.name = "index", .mode = 0444, .owner = THIS_MODULE},
+ .attr = {.name = "index", .mode = 0444},
.show = smbiosinstance_show,
};

--
1.7.1

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/