Re: [PATCH 1/2 #upstream] sata_fsl,mv,nv: prepare for NCQ commandcompletion update

[Jeff Garzik]

On 08/02/2010 03:18 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Jeff.
>
> On 08/02/2010 01:47 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > So, something like this.  I tested both flavors of sata_nv but don't
> > > have access to sata_mv or sata_fsl, but the conversion is pretty
> > > straight forward and failures should be pretty easy to catch.
> >
> > applied
>
> Are you planning on applying the second patch too?

sata_mv is behaving weirdly in 2.6.35 + these patches, on the older 6081 
chip, embedded in a Dell server box.  Looking into it...

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/