Re: Preview of changes to the Security susbystem for 2.6.36

[Christian Stroetmann]

Aloha Serge;
On the 02.08.2010 20:08, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Christian Stroetmann (stroetmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx):
>    
> > Aloha James, Aloha Kees;
> > Ont the 02.08.2010 08:57,  Kees Cook wrote:
> >      
> > > On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 04:41:08PM +1000, James Morris wrote:
> > >        
> > > > On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > >          
> > > > > Well, at least I'll have something for my summit presentation again.
> > > > >
> > > > > On the other hand, it's rather hard for me to defend against a private NAK.
> > > > >            
> > A private NAK against a company's developer's OK
> > Where is the difference private and company? I thought that it
> > doesn't matter who and what a developer is, and where she/he comes
> > from.
> >      
> That's not what private means in this case.  A private nak is one made
> in a private email, so that the list - and the submitter - can't see the
> rationale.  It is problematic because it doesn't really allow the other
> party to address the objection.
>
> (No big deal - Christoph has since responded in public.)
>
>    

Sorry, but AFAIK the NAK by Christoph that I meant was written in a 
public e-mail with full context to the LSM mailing list some weeks ago 
around the end of June (23 June 2010?!) and I thought Kees meant this 
NAK. :D

But thanks for trying to clearify the case.

Sorry Kees, if you indeed meant with private NAK a NAK made in a private 
e-mail.

Have fun
Christian Stroetmann
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/