Re: Panic in reserve_memtype()

[Jack Steiner]

> 
> I guess I found an obvious problem in the code. Can you check whether the
> below patch resolves the panic you are seeing.
> 
> Thanks,
> Venki


Works great!! Thanks...


> 
> 
> new->type should only change when there is a valid ret_type. Otherwise
> requested type and return type should be same.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c |    4 +++-
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c
> index e4cd229..58b6de1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c
> @@ -223,7 +223,9 @@ int rbt_memtype_check_insert(struct memtype *new, unsigned long *ret_type)
>  						new->type, ret_type);
>  
>  	if (!err) {
> -		new->type = *ret_type;
> +		if (ret_type)
> +			new->type = *ret_type;
> +
>  		memtype_rb_insert(&memtype_rbroot, new);
>  	}
>  	return err;
> -- 
> 1.6.0.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/