Re: cpufreq cleanups - .30 vs .31

[Dave Jones]

On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 01:18:18PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:

 > So if not find too intrusive, I'd say:
 > Venkatesh's whole series of:
 > [patch 0/4] Take care of cpufreq lockdep issues (take 2)
 > should be seen in .31.
 >  ...
 > The one patch from Mathieu:
 > [patch 2.6.30 2/4] CPUFREQ: fix (utter) cpufreq_add_dev mess
 > is a separate, general cleanup which should show up in .31.

I came to the same conclusion after reading the thread, and looking
over the patches.  I merged the above, and sent Linus a pull request
a few minutes ago.

Thanks Mathieu and Venki for chasing this down.

	Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/