Re: [RFC v6][PATCH 4/4] intel_txt: force IOMMU on for Intel(R) TXTlaunch

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Sun Jul 05 2009 - 16:27:22 EST



* Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri 2009-07-03 10:21:11, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Tue 2009-06-30 19:31:10, Joseph Cihula wrote:
> > > > The tboot module will DMA protect all of memory in order to ensure the that
> > > > kernel will be able to initialize without compromise (from DMA). Consequently,
> > > > the kernel must enable Intel(R) Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O
> > > > (VT-d or Intel IOMMU) in order to replace this broad protection with the
> > > > appropriate page-granular protection. Otherwise DMA devices will be unable
> > > > to read or write from memory and the kernel will eventually panic.
> > > >
> > > > Because runtime IOMMU support is configurable by command line options, this
> > > > patch will force it to be enabled regardless of the options specified, and will
> > > > log a message if it was required to force it on.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > dmar.c | 7 +++++++
> > > > intel-iommu.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> > > > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Joseph Cihula <joseph.cihula@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Shane Wang <shane.wang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > NAK. Breaks user expectations, misses docs updates.
> >
> > What's your proposed solution? If an incompatible IOMMU option
> > is specified should the kernel to disable TXT and panic?
>
> Yes.
>
> ...and whether we decide one way or another, it needs to be
> documented.a

But the user already specified another thing as well: that we should
boot with TXT.

So we have conflicting user options. Wouldnt it be the proper
engineering solution to print a warning about the incompatible IOMMU
option and disable it, but not crash the bootup? We generally prefer
to boot up.

Anyway, this is a small detail clearly.

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/