Re: [PATCH] check spinlock_t/rwlock_t argument type on non-SMPbuilds

[Ingo Molnar]

* David Kilroy <kilroyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> When writing code for UP without CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK it's easy 
> to get the first argument to the spinlock/rwlock functions wrong. 
> This is because the parameter is not actually used in this 
> configuration.
> 
> Typically you will only find out it's wrong
>  * by rebuilding with CONFIG_SMP or CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
>  * after you've submitted your beautiful patch series.
> 
> The first means a long wait, and the latter is a bit late.
> 
> Add typechecking on the first argument of these macro functions. 
> Note that since the typecheck now references the variable, the 
> explicit read is redundant and can be removed.
> 
> This change causes compiler warnings in net/ipv4/route.c, as this 
> passes NULL as the first argument in the UP configuration. Simply 
> cast this.

Wondering - can the wrappers be moved from CPP land to C land by 
turning them into inlines? (i havent checked all usages so there 
might be some surprises, but by and large it ought to be possible.)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/