Re: [PATCH] Added CONFIG_VFAT_FS_DUALNAMES option

From: Alan Cox
Date: Thu Jul 02 2009 - 06:33:03 EST


On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:42:39 +1000
tridge@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Hi Alan,
>
> > > There really was no such thing as "vfat" anyway. VFAT in the Windows
> >
> > In the eyes of the end user there is such a thing as vfat. This is about
> > expectations not technical issues.
>
> Do you have an example of an end user device that would be affected by
> this change, and which is never distributed in any of the countries
> where a varient of this patent exists?

You gave one: Microsoft Windows XP. Risk of very rare system crashes.

Thats enough in a high reliability environment to require the file system
in question is banned from use site wide at may locations. Can't have a
flash card bringing down a windows dependant US destroyer can they.

Getting "not vfat" by suprise is thus really really bad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/