Re: [PATCH] - support inheritance of mlocks across fork/exec V2
From: Jon Masters
Date: Fri Jun 05 2009 - 00:40:51 EST
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 14:04 -0500, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> Add support for mlockall(MCL_INHERIT|MCL_RECURSIVE):
FWIW, I really liked this patch series. And I think there is still value
in a generic "mlock" wrapper utility that I can use. Sure, the later on
containers suggestions are all wonderful in theory but I don't see that
that went anywhere either (and I disagree that we can't trust people to
use this right without doing silly things) - if I'm really right that
this got dropped on the floor, can we resurrect it in .31 please?
Jon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/