RE: [patch 0/2] Intel IOMMU Suspend/Resume Support
From: Yu, Fenghua
Date: Wed Mar 25 2009 - 16:57:26 EST
>Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] Intel IOMMU Suspend/Resume Support
>
>It looks like patch 1 calls dmar_reenable_qi but patch 2 defines it.
>
>In 2.6.29, there's no dmar_disable_qi that I can see. Can you respin
>these against something a little less scary than -tip during a merge
>window? (Especially since -stable will need this soon.)
>
dmar_disable_qi() is defined in tip tree already. This patch set is based on the tip tree. I do have another version of the patch set which is based on 2.6.29.
Ingo,
Do you think which tree this patch set should based on?
Thanks.
-Fenghua
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/