Re: [PATCH 4/6] ftrace, x86: make kernel text writable only forconversions

[Pavel Machek]

> > > The very old text poke code I had for this just used a dynamic
> > > mapping elsewhere instead to modify the code. That's much less
> > > intrusive than changing the complete mappings. Any reason you can't use 
> > > that too?
> > 
> > Is it legal to have two mappings of same page with different
> > attributes? IIRC some processors did not like that...
> 
> If you mean PAT caching attributes: correct it is not legal in x86 and
> causes problems including data corruption.

Aha, PAT is what I remembered on x86-64.

> If you mean other attributes like large page vs small page: it's normally legal,
> with a few exceptions.

...but is it okay on other architectures, like sparc, with funky cache
setups?
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/