Re: How much of a mess does OpenVZ make? ;) Was: What can OpenVZdo?

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri Feb 27 2009 - 04:24:40 EST


On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:03:23 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> * Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > I think the main question is: will we ever find ourselves in
> > > the future saying that "C/R sucks, nobody but a small
> > > minority uses it, wish we had never merged it"? I think the
> > > likelyhood of that is very low. I think the current OpenVZ
> > > stuff already looks very useful, and i dont think we've
> > > realized (let alone explored) all the possibilities yet.
> >
> > This is collecting and start of dumping part of cleaned up
> > OpenVZ C/R implementation, FYI.
> >
> > arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h | 2
> > arch/x86/kernel/syscall_table_32.S | 2
> > include/linux/Kbuild | 1
> > include/linux/cr.h | 56 ++++++
> > include/linux/ipc_namespace.h | 3
> > include/linux/syscalls.h | 5
> > init/Kconfig | 2
> > kernel/Makefile | 1
> > kernel/cr/Kconfig | 11 +
> > kernel/cr/Makefile | 8
> > kernel/cr/cpt-cred.c | 115 +++++++++++++
> > kernel/cr/cpt-fs.c | 122 +++++++++++++
> > kernel/cr/cpt-mm.c | 134 +++++++++++++++
> > kernel/cr/cpt-ns.c | 324 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > kernel/cr/cpt-signal.c | 121 +++++++++++++
> > kernel/cr/cpt-sys.c | 228 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > kernel/cr/cr-ctx.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++
> > kernel/cr/cr.h | 61 ++++++
> > kernel/cr/rst-sys.c | 9 +
> > kernel/sys_ni.c | 3
> > 20 files changed, 1349 insertions(+)
>
> That does not look scary to me at all. Andrew?

I think we'd need to look into the details. Sure, it's isolated from a
where-it-is-in-the-tree POV. But I assume that each of those files has
intimate and intrusive knowledge of the internals of data structures?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/