Re: [RFC] introduce pr_cont macro

[Harvey Harrison]

On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 04:13 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 04:03 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > We cover all log-levels by pr_... macros except
> > > > KERN_CONT one. Add it for convenience.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > > I think start printing with some pr_... macro
> > > > and continue with printk(KERN_CONT ...) look
> > > > not that clear -- better to continue with
> > > > same pr_... slogan. Thoughts? I hope I didn't
> > > > miss anything.
> > > > 
> > > >  include/linux/kernel.h |    2 ++
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > Index: linux-2.6.git/include/linux/kernel.h
> > > > ===================================================================
> > > > --- linux-2.6.git.orig/include/linux/kernel.h
> > > > +++ linux-2.6.git/include/linux/kernel.h
> > > > @@ -370,6 +370,8 @@ static inline char *pack_hex_byte(char *
> > > >          printk(KERN_NOTICE pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > > >  #define pr_info(fmt, ...) \
> > > >          printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > > > +#define pr_cont(fmt, ...) \
> > > > +        printk(KERN_CONT pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > > 
> > > Makes sense.
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > 
> > Don't you want to omit the pr_fmt() from the KERN_CONT case?
> 
> indeed, good catch. It should be:
> 
> #define pr_cont(fmt, ...) \
> 	printk(KERN_CONT ##__VA_ARGS__)

Missing fmt entirely?

Harvey

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/