Re: [PATCH 14/15] bitops: Change the bitmap index from int to unsigned long [frv]

[David Howells]

H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > But how does it break down between "static inline type\nfunction_name" and
> > "static inline\ntype function_name"?  That's more to the point.
> >
> 
> I believe that is the breakdown is roughly what you see above, i.e. over 8:1;
> the pattern I used was looking for "^static inline[^;(]*$", and a visual
> examination of the results shows that even if my line count is slighly off the
> lopsidedness is still dramatic.

Sorry, I meant:

"static inline type\nfunction_name" vs "static inline type function_name"

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/