Re: ATA support for 4k sector size

From: david
Date: Wed Feb 25 2009 - 19:14:22 EST


On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Martin K. Petersen wrote:

"david" == david <david@xxxxxxx> writes:

512-byte logical / 512-byte hardware (current) 512-byte logical /
4096-byte hardware (ATA, doing read-modify-write) 4096-byte logical /
4096-byte hardware (SCSI initially, ATA later)

david> add to this good support for SSDs

david> ?? logical / 128K hardware

david> or similar.

Yep. And that goes for RAID arrays too.

For SCSI there some knobs we can query to get this information and my
alignment changes are using those (and they are in turn what Willy's
stuff hooks into).

I've been lobbying the SSD vendors whose architecture is prone to
misalignment problems to propose a similar set of knobs for ATA. But so
far it's just been a lot of talking.

even if we can't get them to give us any info from the drive directly, we still want to allow the sysadmin to configure the use of the systems when they can find the info in other ways.

My topology changes are a bit abstract in the sense that they expose:

- smallest I/O you can submit without incurring a penalty (hw sector,
raid chunk size)

- optimal I/O size for the device in question

- biggest I/O you can submit without incurring a penalty

- alignment

We can use these parameters to lay out partitions and filesystems
optimally. Just like we currently do with XFS but implemented in a more
generic way that all filesystems can use.

if you have the smallest and largest I/O you can submit without a penalty and the alignment, isn't the optimal I/O size everything between these two? (or at least everything between these two may be close enough that defining an 'optimal' size may not be worthwhile)

David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/