Re: [PATCH 1/6] [2.6.29] epoll: fix for epoll_wait sometimes returningevents on closed fds

[Tony Battersby]

Davide Libenzi wrote:
> No. Like it has been explained, MT applications can report events for 
> closed files anyway. It is a matter of where the close() happen in time 
> (pretty easy to figure out if you make a time/thread chart).
> As for the other patches, some could be applied, but I didn't look at them 
> deeply and I need time to review them. Will take time to review them 
> tomorrow or the day after.
>
>
>
> - Davide
>
>
>
>   

OK then.  Not the answer I wanted, but that's life.  Good news for
everyone else though - there is no need to remake the patches already in
-mm.  So please ignore the patches marked [2.6.29] and use the patches
marked [-mm] instead (excluding patch #1, which has now been rejected).

Tony

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/