Re: Is 386 processor still supported?

[Maciej W. Rozycki]

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Alan Cox wrote:

> >  UP emulation of CMPXCHG and XADD for userland should be rather trivial, 
> > so why not include it like with LL/SC for MIPS?
> 
> Why not just ship an additional libc with the right options ?

 Does not work for MIPS as glibc has no equivalent code for pre-LL/SC CPUs 
and LL/SC is always used.  For the i386 the situation seems worse yet as 
for pre-i486 CPUs a generic C implementation of compare-and-exchange is 
used guaranteeing silent thread unsafety. :(

 IMO, a kernel emulation of CMPXCHG and XADD (both are used by 
sysdeps/i386/i486/bits/atomic.h in glibc) with an optional LOCK prefix, 
guaranteeing UP atomicity would be a cheap way to provide long-term i386 
userland support with little burden for both Linux and respective user 
software maintainers.  Certainly it adds some bloat to the kernel, but I 
think it is not an option that should be outright dismissed without 
consideration.

  Maciej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/