On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:38:05 -0600
Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 28, 2008 16:16 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
I also have a min() check in there to make sure we don't sleepIs there a particular reason why 1 jiffie is considered the "right
longer than a jiffie in case our storage is super slow, this was
requested by Andrew.
amount" of time to sleep, given this is a kernel config parameter and
has nothing to do with the storage? Considering a seek time in the
range of ~10ms this would only be right for HZ=100 and the wait would
well... my disk does a 50 usec seek time or so.. so I don't mind ;-)
in fact it sounds awefully long to me.