Re: Out of tree module using LSM
From: Jon Masters
Date: Thu Nov 29 2007 - 12:06:38 EST
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 08:47 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 11:36:12AM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 17:07 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > The easiest way is as Al described above, just have the userspace
> > > program that wrote the file to disk, check it then.
> > But the problem is that this isn't just Samba, this is a countless
> > myriad of different applications. And if one of them doesn't support
> > on-access scanning, then the whole solution isn't worth using.
> Ok, which specific applications do they care about? Last time I asked
> it was still limited to a very small handful, all of which would be
> trivial to add such a hook to.
Like I said, I'm trying to put together a set of "feature requirements"
that we can publish to LKML and get feedback. I am lead to believe that
they basically want to trap every file operation, of every potential
userspace program, so I don't think it's a handful at this point.
> > > There are some nice SAMBA plugins that do just that already out there...
> > That's really not the problem :-)
> Yes it is. That's all you want to catch, when a Windows machine wants
> to access a file on a SAMBA server. Do the check then, in userspace.
Oh, I meant that if it was just Samba we'd all be home and dry by now.
> Believe me, I've been over and over and over and over this before...
Yeah. I know, I'm trying not to flog a dead horse here, but I think
there's real genuine interest here this time around. So, maybe I'm just
trying because everyone else already did, but it's worth a shot :-)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/