RE: process starvation with 2.6 scheduler
From: Mike Galbraith
Date: Wed Jun 14 2006 - 01:08:36 EST
On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 16:03 -0700, Kallol Biswas wrote:
> It seems that with the priority set to 19 the netserver processes do not starve but still we have unfair scheduling issue. The netperf clients do not timeout now but one of the servers runs much less than the other. It seems that thorough understanding of scheduling algorithm is essential at this point.
Are the clients all on one box?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/