Re: [PATCH] local_irq_disable removal

[Mika PenttilÃ]

Daniel Walker wrote:

> On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, [ISO-8859-15] Mika Penttilï wrote:
>  
>
> > Not with !softirq_preemption, then we take the immediate path and 
> > process soft irqs on irq exit.
> >    
>
> My changes aren't used in that case.
>
> Daniel
>
>
>  
ok, so maybe the safe way is to enforce threaded softirq with the soft 
irq flag.

--Mika


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/