Re: [10/07] sparc: Fix PTRACE_CONT bogosity
From: Alan Cox
Date: Wed Apr 27 2005 - 13:58:31 EST
On Mer, 2005-04-27 at 19:38, Chris Wright wrote:
> -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> SunOS aparently had this weird PTRACE_CONT semantic which
> we copied. If the addr argument is something other than
> 1, it sets the process program counter to whatever that
> value is.
7-9 look sane don't see why 10 is a critical issue but then its in arch
specific obscure code and obvious.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/