Re: Please open sysfs symbols to proprietary modules
From: Greg KH
Date: Wed Feb 02 2005 - 20:24:43 EST
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 07:07:21PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 03:23:30PM -0800, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> >>What is wrong with creating a (GPL'd) abstraction layer that exports
> >>symbols to the proprietary modules?
> >Ick, no!
> >Please consult with a lawyer before trying this. I know a lot of them
> >consider doing this just as forbidden as marking your module
> >MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); when it really isn't.
> There will be a GPL'd layer, and it's likely that sysfs interaction will
> be on the GPL'd side anyway, for purely technical reasons. But it does
> feel like circumvention of the limitations set in the kernel.
It is. And as such, it is not allowed.
> I thought it would be polite to ask the developers to lift those
> limitations, considering that they seem unfair and inconsistent with
> the stated purpose of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.
No, the stated purpose of that marking is to prevent non-GPLd code from
using those symbols. I don't see how you can state that using sysfs
files in your driver does not make it a "derived work" and force you to
make all of your driver GPL.
I suggest that you consult your company's lawyers for what to do here.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/