Re: 2.6.10-as1

[Andres Salomon]

On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 23:31 +0000, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Frank Steiner wrote:
> > When I take an unpatched 2.6.10 and apply only the 033 patch, it fails,
> > too. Is it possible that the rlimit patch needs some more patches from
> > the bitkeeper repository to work correctly? And that those patches
> > are missing in the -as1?  Or is the patch just wrong?
> > 
> > Can anyone confirm this problem? I attach my config for the full -as1
> > tree kernel and a strace log for some segfaulting mount. Hope this helps!
> 
> I can confirm this. For me, fsck exits with sig11 during bootup sequence, 
> which causes my init scripts to think my root partition is dead. Investigating 
> now...
> 

Odd.  I'll have to try Frank's .config and see if I can reproduce it (it
doesn't happen w/ mine).


-- 
Andres Salomon <dilinger@xxxxxxxxx>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part