Re: kernbench on 512p
From: Jesse Barnes
Date: Fri Aug 20 2004 - 12:28:13 EST
On Friday, August 20, 2004 11:57 am, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> If I am not too confused, you need #4 and #5 out of Manfred's set of
> five RCU_HUGE patchset. They are at:
> A little work will be required to get them to apply. For example, in
> the first patch, instead of:
> one would say:
> due to the addition of the _bh() primitives. The "rcu_ctrlblk."
> and "rcu_state." have been replaced by pointers in order to handle
> multiple different types of grace periods:
> o Traditional grace periods based on context switch, executing
> in user mode, or running the idle loop.
> o New-age low-latency grace periods based on running with
> interrupts enabled.
Looks like a bit more context has changed. Manfred, care to respin against
-mm3 so I can test?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/