Re: PF_MEMALLOC in 2.6
From: Oliver Neukum
Date: Fri Aug 20 2004 - 09:53:04 EST
> If you let me gloat for a little bit, ub makes this discussion moot
> because it has no helper thread. But getting back to usb-storage,
But ub supports only a subset of storage devices, doesn't it?
> This is what made me suspect that it's the diry memory writeout problem.
> It's just like how it was on 2.4 before Alan added PF_MEMALLOC.
If we add PF_MEMALLOC, do we solve the issue or make it only less
likely? Isn't there a need to limit users of the reserves in number?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/