Re: [PATCH] 18.104.22.168-mm2 --- UML build fixes
From: Sam Ravnborg
Date: Thu Aug 19 2004 - 15:33:05 EST
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 05:19:23PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx said:
> > What makes um so speciel that it cannot handle .lds files in arch/um/
> > kernel like all other architectures? That would allow um to utilise
> > the kbuild infrastructure, and no need for duplication.
> Beats me, as the comment says, I could not get the kbuild .lds.S : .lds rule
> to fire for uml.lds.S. make kept sending it to the asm .S.o rule.
That's beause so little of the kbuild infrastructure is enabled
when including arch/um/Makefile
You need to move the *.lds.S files to for example arch/um/kernel then
you can use the kbuild infrastructure.
The fact that the .S.o rule is enabled is due to the kallsyms hack.
> > Code located in arch/um/ is an error. No code should stay there.
> OK, that's easily fixed.
> > In general they seems too complicated for the task solved - but it may
> > be needed.
> Yeah, they are. They desperately need a reaming.
For klibc I'm halfway with kbuild infrastructure to build user programs.
Syntax is very similar to what is know today, and I hope we can use it
for um as well.
See: linux-sam.bkbits.net select klibc
Browse source and look into usr/kinit/Makefile for an example
But to use this for um we would need to separte all user mode programs
out in separate directories . as discused before.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/