Re: [PATCH] [LSM] Rework LSM hooks
From: Takashi Iwai
Date: Mon Aug 16 2004 - 09:23:44 EST
At Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:22:13 +0200,
Kurt Garloff wrote:
> [1 <text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)>]
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 01:12:17PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> > * James Morris (jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > > On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Chris Wright wrote:
> > > > Is this new (i.e. you just did this)? It's basically the same result we
> > > > had from a few years ago.
> > >
> > > Yes, did it today.
> > Thanks, James. Since these are the only concrete numbers and they are
> > in the noise, I see no compelling reason to change to unlikely().
> Well, you may want to drop the unlikely if you dislike it.
It can be dependent on CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM_VALUE?
(E.g. use unlikely() when it's 0)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/