From: Martin Schlemmer
Date: Wed Aug 11 2004 - 23:44:18 EST
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 01:04, Matt Heler wrote:
> This applied fine here with some tweaking. Removing the nmi fixes from the np
> patch allowed it to apply just fine with some offsets , but not fuzz.
Yeah, I got it to apply with one small reject I think. I assume you
did build it? Do you have CONFIG_SCHED_SMT enabled?
> On Wednesday 11 August 2004 3:13 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 11:52, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/2.6.8-rc3-np1/
> > >
> > > Patch is against 2.6.8-rc3-mm2 only at this stage due to significant
> > > memory management changes in there making it difficult to track Linus'
> > > tree as well.
> > >
> > > Feedback on the scheduler would be much appreciated, as it might get
> > > a run in Andrew's tree soon.
> > I am trying to get it patched against rc4-mm1, but it seems there
> > are some issues with the SMT bits - dependent_sleeper for example
> > is still around although it was removed with all previous patches
> > (and uses task_t.time_slice which is no longer there).
> > I assume you forgot to apply them? Possible to get a complete
> > patch? If not, I'll see if I can get something going after some
> > sleep.
> > Thanks,
Description: This is a digitally signed message part