On Saturday 20 March 2004 19:29, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
Len Brown wrote:
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 14:22, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
Hmm, I just did a cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/power:
active state: C1
default state: C1
bus master activity: 00000000
*C1: promotion[--] demotion[--] latency usage
C2: <not supported>
C3: <not supported>
I am currently NOT using APIC mode (nforce2, as well) and using vanilla 2.6.4. It seems C1 halt state isn't used, which exlains why I am having
Actually I think it is that we don't _count_ C1 usage.
Hmm, OK, then I am really puzzled what specifically about mm sources make my idle temps hotter, as I still couldn't properly resolve it what is causing it. I thought ACPI, but no, using APM only does the same (apm only with vanilla is low temp though.)
Have you seen this thread, it may be relevant?
Re: [2.6.4-rc2] bogus semicolon behind if()