Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Hugetlbpages in very large memorymachines.......
From: Stephen Smalley
Date: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:26:09 EST
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 15:25, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Seems reasonable, although "vm_enough_acctdom" makes my eyes pop. Why not
> keep the "vm_enough_memory" identifier?
> I've asked Stephen for comment - assuming he's OK with it I'd ask you to
> finish this off please.
To keep the name, he needs to update all callers, right? Current patch
appears to add a static inline for security_vm_enough_memory that
retains the old interface to avoid having to update most callers.
I don't have any fundamental problem with the nature of the change. As
a side note, patch was malformed (at least as I received it), not sure
if that was just a problem on my end.
Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
National Security Agency
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/