Re: [RFC][PATCH} 2.6 and grsecurity
From: Chris Wright
Date: Mon Feb 16 2004 - 21:46:43 EST
* Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx (Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx) wrote:
> OK.. I can do that easily enough - only reason I didn't was because that would
> force the inclusion of ip_randomid() and the corresponding call even when the
> feature wasn't selected, making it more intrusive (the 'else' clause is also the
> "when not configured at all" code - moving the whole if/then/else to another
> function was more intrusive, to my thinking..)
#define ip_randomid(x) (x)
int ip_randomid(int id)
or somesuch, you get the idea.
> > > + * 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this softwar
> > > + * must display the following acknowledgement:
> > > + * This product includes software developed by Niels Provos.
> > Advertsing clause...this is not GPL compatible.
> Thanks for spotting that. It's the same way in grsecurity's patch - do they
> have an issue as well? Or they OK because they're only doing a separately
> distributed patch?
I suspect yes, but, of course, IANAL ;-)
Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/