Re: seperator error in __mask_snprintf_len
From: Paul Jackson
Date:  Fri Jan 09 2004 - 09:28:56 EST
Joe, responding to Paul M:
> > Why do you have to reference them as u32?  Why can't you use unsigned
> > long instead?  That should Just Work.
> 
> I believe he wants the commas to group the digits by at most eight
> irrespective of architecture.  Which seems reasonable.
Yes - that's why I use u32 - each comma separated word in the
ascii representation of a mask represents 32 bits, regardless
of the native word size of the current architecture.
-- 
                          I won't rest till it's the best ...
                          Programmer, Linux Scalability
                          Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/