Re: [PATCH] check headers for complete includes, etc.
From: Dominik Kubla
Date: Mon Sep 29 2003 - 12:17:17 EST
Am Montag, 29. September 2003 17:00 schrieb Jörn Engel:
> Would work. But I'd prefer to have that information inside the header
> files, under some syntax.
> /* attr: indirect header */
> Is this acceptable?
Just a suggestion: Make it a define. Comments tend to be re-formatted,
"improved", deleted, etc. You get the picture. So I think that:
#define PRAGMA_INDIRECT_HEADER TRUE
(or something similiar) would be better suited.
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit
atrocities. (Francois Marie Arouet aka Voltaire, 1694-1778)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/