Re: experiences beyond 4 GB RAM with 2.4.22
From: Mike Fedyk
Date: Fri Sep 12 2003 - 02:54:26 EST
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 12:46:46 +1000
> Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Both are 2.4.22. 192.168.1.1 is the testbox. I saw those with 2GB, but
> > > could fix it through more nfs-daemons and
> > >
> > > echo 2097152 >/proc/sys/net/core/rmem_max
> > > echo 2097152 >/proc/sys/net/core/wmem_max
> > >
> > > Are these values too small for 6 GB?
> > No. The values are proportional to the number of server threads, not
> > the amount of RAM... and they should be un-necessary after 2.4.20
> > anyway as nfsd in the kernel makes the appropriate settings.
So then what do I need to to get those error messages off of my nfs clients?
I have seen this with for a long time through 2.4 and 2.5 (didn't use nfs
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/