Daniel Phillips <email@example.com> wrote:
> As for compilation speed, yes, that sucks. I doubt there's any rational
> reason for it, but I also agree with the idea that correctness and binary
> code performance should come first, then the compilation speed issue should
> be addressed.
No. Compilation inefficiency directly harms programmer efficiency and the
quality and volume of code the programmer produces. These are surely the
most important things by which a toolchain's usefulness should be judged.
I compile with -O1 all the time and couldn't care the teeniest little bit
about the performance of the generated code - it just doesn't matter.
I'm happy allowing those thousands of people who do not compile kernels all
the time to shake out any 3.2/3.3 compilation problems.
Compilation inefficiency is the most serious thing wrong with gcc.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 23 2003 - 22:00:38 EST