Re: [announce] procps 2.0.13 with NPTL enhancements
From: Xose Vazquez Perez (email@example.com)
Date: Fri May 30 2003 - 14:05:00 EST
Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
>>You finally fixed a SEGV that I fixed well
>>over a year ago. Congradulations. You have
>>others to fix, and a minor (?) security
>>issue as well. Have fun.
> Again, you know there is a problem but you
> don't say anything about it.
> You do not want to fix it, don't you ?
> This is fine with me (even if it is hard to
> understand the reason), but you are just
> /wrong/ when you know about a problem and
> don't provide information about it.
> Again, this is just my opinion...
the root of the problem is that not all
packages maintainers of distributions send feedback/fixes
to _origianl software writer_. And you have cases
like this. Diferents tastes from same software,
everyone with its bugs and features.
Without to go too far, there are a lot of stupid
fixes into distributions kernels not present in 2.4.21-rcX
This is a general problem, and IMHO the distributions maintainers
should send more feedback to package maintainer more frequently.
Software is like sex, it's better when it's bug free.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/